We’ve already outlined why API performance matters and what aspects of APIs to test, but what is the difference between API testing and monitoring?
As with most things, context matters. The use cases for testing and monitoring are different because the objectives are different. The ultimate goal is to verify that your APIs are functioning properly, but staging environments vary significantly from production environments.
Identifying a performance or functional problem in production is less than ideal. Testing should be integrated throughout the dev process because testing for code defects in pre-production helps minimize risk, thereby saving you time and money.
In pre-production, you want more flexibility because the use case of what you are trying to accomplish is different than it is in production. For instance, you don’t need to know if an API is stable and reliable. Rather, you need to know that you didn’t create a defect or slow down a workflow with a new update. Testing seeks to validate that performance and functionality haven’t been impacted by updates.
With API testing you want to:
The value of testing lies in identifying the deltas that occur once changes to the environment are introduced. As a result, tests should be run around these changes, but don’t need to be ongoing.
Testing in pre-production, however, doesn’t negate the need to monitor production or live API performance on an ongoing basis. Performance monitoring verifies that APIs are functional, secure, and fast. This is especially critical to both identify and troubleshoot outages and errors in production environments that are often erratic.
API monitoring helps you do a few important things such as:
API Monitoring can help pinpoint failure
While API monitoring solutions could be used for testing, they aren’t fit for purpose. Pre-production environments are more controlled than production environments and failures likely won’t result in lost income. And, aspects of these products that are beneficial in production monitoring can actually be a hindrance in pre-production.
Both performance testing and monitoring are essential to approaching performance in a holistic way. You likely already leverage some form of functional testing, but if an aspect of your digital user experience–including your APIs–isn’t fast then we argue that they aren’t functional. For instance, if a critical API flow goes from taking half a second to complete to taking ten seconds, the API isn’t delivering a good user experience, even if it is technically functional. Finding that out in pre-production is ideal, so it can be addressed.
API testing and monitoring go hand-in-hand and comprise a comprehensive approach to delivering the best possible user experience. Performance testing seeks to increase the speed, transparency, and confidence by which you deliver user experiences. Monitoring helps ensure that those user experiences stay fast and reliable.
See an error or have a suggestion? Please let us know by emailing ssg-blogs@splunk.com.
This posting does not necessarily represent Splunk's position, strategies or opinion.
The Splunk platform removes the barriers between data and action, empowering observability, IT and security teams to ensure their organizations are secure, resilient and innovative.
Founded in 2003, Splunk is a global company — with over 7,500 employees, Splunkers have received over 1,020 patents to date and availability in 21 regions around the world — and offers an open, extensible data platform that supports shared data across any environment so that all teams in an organization can get end-to-end visibility, with context, for every interaction and business process. Build a strong data foundation with Splunk.