In software development, two primary models of software exist: open source and closed source. Both types have their benefits and drawbacks, and understanding the differences between them can help you make informed decisions when choosing software for your projects.
To simplify the concepts of open source and closed source software, let’s use the analogy of community cookbooks — open source — and a secret family recipe: the closed source.
The Community Cookbook. Imagine you have a cookbook that's been passed around in your community. Everyone is encouraged to add their own recipes, tweak existing ones, and share feedback on how to make the dishes even better. This cookbook is always growing, changing, and improving with each contribution. Here, you can copy any recipe for yourself, modify it to suit your taste, and share your version with others.
Open source software (OSS) works the same way, with licensing that allows users to freely access, modify, and distribute the source code without restrictions. The open nature of the code encourages developers to write better code, ultimately leading to higher-quality software through community review and shared goals.
Some popular examples of open-source software include Linux, Mozilla Firefox, WordPress, and Apache.
Open source software has numerous advantages for both individual developers and businesses. Some key benefits include:
Collaboration & community. The hive-mind approach often results in robust, rapidly evolving software that spans a wide array of use cases.
Transparency. Users can peek under the hood of the code, contributing to the security and reliability of the software products.
Flexibility. Open source's freeform nature allows for tailoring software products to fit unique needs without high costs or constraints.
Cost efficiency. The zero-cost entry ensures accessibility for all, making it an attractive option for individuals and companies operating on shoestring budgets.
While open source offers undeniable advantages, it is not without its challenges including:
Support & documentation. While communities offer support, the lack of formal customer service can be a drawback. Technical documentation can also be less comprehensive.
Complexity & fragmentation. The freedom to modify the code can lead to fragmentation or compatibility issues between different versions or forks of the software.
Monetization challenges. For developers, finding a profitable business model while keeping the software open source can be challenging.
The Secret Family Recipe. Now, imagine that instead of a community cookbook, you have a secret family recipe passed down through generations. Only family members know the ingredients and how to make the dish. If you're not part of the family, you can't see the recipe, let alone change it.
You can enjoy the dish if it's shared with you, but the secret of making it remains closely guarded.
Closed source software operates on a similar principle. The software's source code is proprietary, and its development is controlled by an individual or a company. Users can purchase or license the software to use it, but they cannot see how it's built or make any modifications to it.
Some well-known examples of closed source software include Microsoft Windows, Adobe Photoshop, Apple iOS, and Splunk.
The security and exclusivity offered by closed source software can present unique advantages to both businesses and individual users including:
Stability & support. With dedicated teams and resources, closed source software often receives regular, well-defined updates. Technical support is typically easier to access, ensuring prompt assistance when needed rather than wading through forums and documentation on your own.
User experience. The emphasis on user-friendly design often results in intuitive interfaces and feature sets that match user expectations.
Profitable model. Licenses and subscriptions offer developers a reliable income stream, fueling continued innovation and support of the software.
(Related reading: cost management strategies for IT leaders & IT spending trends.)
Despite the benefits, closed source software can present challenges that impact user and developer experiences alike, such as:
High cost of entry. Most closed source software requires purchasing a license or subscription, which can be expensive.
Burden of customization. Users often cannot easily modify the software to fit their specific needs as easily as with open source software.
Transparency & security. Without access to the software's source code, users must trust the vendor for security and privacy, which can be a concern.
Choosing between open source and closed source software depends on various factors such as budget, support requirements, and the need for customization. Both software models have their place in the world of development, catering to different needs and preferences.
When choosing between open source and closed source software, you need to think about:
Open source software can be the right choice if you need a flexible solution that you can tweak to precisely fit your needs. On the other hand, closed source software might be more suitable if you prioritize ready-to-use, stable products with dedicated support.
Open source software can significantly reduce costs related to licensing fees, making it an attractive option for startups or organizations with limited budgets. However, remember that some open source projects may require additional investment in customization and support.
Closed source software often has significant upfront costs but may result in long-term cost savings with consistent support.
(Know the differences: capital vs. operational expenditures.)
Closed source software often comes with dedicated support and updates from the vendor, making it a better choice for organizations lacking significant IT resources. Open source software relies on community support, documentation, and self-help resources.
If you are a developer or looking to customize software, open source might be ideal due to its flexibility. However, if you do not possess technical skills or require more specific features, you might be better off with closed source software that closely matches your requirements.
Closed source software may offer quicker security updates compared to open source. However, the open source community's collective effort and transparent nature contribute to identifying and addressing vulnerabilities quickly.
(Related reading: CIS Critical Security Controls.)
Ultimately, both open source and closed source software have their strengths and weaknesses, and it's essential to consider your specific needs, resources, and preferences before making a decision.
In enterprises where security and confidentiality are crucial, closed source software might be the preferred option due to its controlled environment and ability to tailor security measures.
In contrast, startups and businesses with limited budgets might lean towards open source software, capitalizing on the cost-efficiency and flexibility it offers for customization and rapid development.
Additionally, it's important to evaluate any industry standards and compliance requirements that must be met. For example:
Financial and healthcare industries might prefer closed source solutions for better control over sensitive data.
Tech startups and educational institutions might opt for open source for their collaborative and innovative nature.
Ultimately, the decision is not black and white and can involve using a combination of both open and closed source software, selecting each based on the specific needs, project requirements, and overall business strategy.
Open source software, like a community cookbook, thrives on collaboration, transparency, and shared growth. For developers and tech enthusiasts, open source software represents an opportunity to learn, contribute, and innovate. This collaborative approach not only accelerates development cycles but also fosters a culture of shared knowledge and improvement.
Closed source software, like a secret family recipe, focuses on control, exclusivity, and providing a consistent, carefully curated experience. Businesses looking for a comprehensive solution with guaranteed support might find more value in closed source software despite its higher upfront costs.
Both have their place in the world, serving different needs and preferences, just as some people love experimenting with recipes — while others prefer the reliability and tradition of family dishes.
Whether an organization opts for open or closed source software depends heavily on its priorities — be it innovation, control, cost, or security. Ultimately, the most successful software decision is one that aligns with the organization's goals and values.
See an error or have a suggestion? Please let us know by emailing ssg-blogs@splunk.com.
This posting does not necessarily represent Splunk's position, strategies or opinion.
The Splunk platform removes the barriers between data and action, empowering observability, IT and security teams to ensure their organizations are secure, resilient and innovative.
Founded in 2003, Splunk is a global company — with over 7,500 employees, Splunkers have received over 1,020 patents to date and availability in 21 regions around the world — and offers an open, extensible data platform that supports shared data across any environment so that all teams in an organization can get end-to-end visibility, with context, for every interaction and business process. Build a strong data foundation with Splunk.