We all know how often attackers gain access to online devices to compromise security. That’s why digital defense is as important as physical defense. However, ensuring digital safety can be more challenging than physical safety. To overcome this problem, authorities combine digital forensics with incident response. But what does this mean?
Digital forensics and incident response (DFIR) is a collective process in which the investigation team uses different tools to understand the incident and respond to it.
Let's understand this in detail and see the key steps involved in the DFIR framework. We’ll also look at its benefits and some challenges to be aware of.
DFIR is a framework that investigates and responds to security vulnerabilities. It is divided into two parts — digital forensics and incident response.
Digital forensics uncovers digital evidence, identifies the attackers, and determines how and when the incident occurred. The incident response phase eliminates threats to recover data with minimal or no damage.
Here’s why this framework is becoming invaluable with the increasing number of cyber threats:
A top resource for the cybersecurity community takes its name directly from this practice: The DFIR Report.
Depending on the type of digital forensics, the data you need to investigate and the incident response plan you prepare will vary. As a result, every time you conduct a digital forensic, you may have to take a different approach. So, let’s understand the most common forensic types:
Disk forensics lets you examine hard drives, computer systems, and firmware. Its goal is to create forensic images that can be submitted to the court.
Wireless forensics allows you to analyze data transmitted over a wireless network. This helps investigate the involvement of wireless networks in illegal activities such as:
Email forensics extracts the sender's name, address, and server information to recover deleted emails because, sometimes, deleted emails serve as evidence of digital crimes.
Network forensics investigates network security for data breaches. Here, you collect information about communication devices, application servers, and log files.
(Related reading: computer forensics & cyber forensics.)
Since DFIR takes a structured approach to investigate and mitigate security breaches, it involves multiple stages. The key steps involved are:
The first step is to gather data and monitor systems for signs of a potential threat. Key areas to investigate include:
During this phase, make sure to examine all online devices and connected systems to detect suspicious activities or indicators of compromise. Once you've identified the affected areas, isolate the compromised devices. By isolating infected systems, you can prepare a risk mitigation plan and block attack vectors to avoid similar vulnerabilities in the future.
Now, analyze the threat type and its impact. It can be a phishing or DDoS attack, which may result in financial loss or reputational damage. For example, you detected a phishing attack, which led to financial loss. Based on this, the court will hopefully determine a guilty verdict for the cyberattacks.
Once you've analyzed the threat, prepare a mitigation and recovery plan. Mitigation minimizes further damage and reduces the risk of future incidents, while recovery restores system, data, and business operations to their normal state.
Here's what a mitigation plan looks like:
By combining these mitigation measures with a structured recovery strategy, you can address the immediate threat and strengthen your defenses against similar incidents in the future.
In the end, you prepare a post-incident report. This report should include all relevant details of the incident, such as:
You can also summarize whether the attack was neutralized after mitigation or if further investigation is required to solve the issue. Once done, others can use this report to understand the vulnerability's behavior.
Each phase — from identification to reporting — provides long-term advantages for improving cybersecurity practices. So, it’s important to understand these key benefits:
While DFIR has many benefits, it is not without its challenges. Despite the structured approach used in the process, organizations often face hurdles that complicate their effectiveness. Let’s look at some of these challenges:
The investigation teams require access to login details, financial records, and employee communication. When you share data with external experts, it puts your online assets at risk. In case of data loss, you may be unable to hold the culprit accountable.
(Related reading: data loss prevention.)
The investigation team deals with large data volumes when investigating a big enterprise. They have to examine different data types, including email accounts, system logs, media files, and web browser histories. This sheer volume, however, is overwhelming: it seems impossible to review hundreds of email addresses and other data.
For example, in the case of a bank's DFIR, you must sift through thousands of financial transactions, login records, and employee access logs, which is quite time-consuming.
This means as the size of an organization grows, so does the complexity of the digital evidence. That’s why it becomes increasingly difficult to find the root cause of the incident and respond promptly.
(See how Splunk helps you extract meaning from all this data.)
To carry out DFIR effectively, an organization needs qualified experts and advanced tools. However, many struggle to meet these requirements due to the global cybersecurity talent shortage. In 2023, it was projected that this shortage would reach 85 million workers and many businesses won’t have the qualified professionals to respond to incidents adequately.
In addition, the tools and software used for DFIR are not always up to date to address the latest threats. If you rely on obsolete technology, it may hinder thorough incident investigation and effective response.
(Related reading: today’s most common cybersecurity jobs.)
Another big concern is compliance with DFIR. You rely on different tools and software to process digital forensics. However, you can face legal charges if the tools don’t comply with privacy laws and regulations.
For example, when investigating data breaches in healthcare, the DFIR may need access to patient records. So, you must ensure the investigation process complies with HIPAA regulations — otherwise your organization may face penalties.
(Related reading: regulatory compliance.)
You now know the challenges, but there are ways that you can adopt to address these challenges:
(Related reading: continuous compliance.)
DFIR helps investigate the increasing number of online crimes — however, its implementation can be tricky. The lack of standardized datasets can make the reliability of evidence questionable in court, and faulty tools can also affect the accuracy of the analysis. So, to make DFIR work better and be trusted, organizations must fix these issues. Despite this, DFIR is still an important measure: after all, online attacks keep getting worse.
See an error or have a suggestion? Please let us know by emailing ssg-blogs@splunk.com.
This posting does not necessarily represent Splunk's position, strategies or opinion.